Basic Reconstruction of Legal Judgment from Supreme Judges Based On Legal Value and Sense of Justice Developing In the Public

Efendi, Jonaedi (2015) Basic Reconstruction of Legal Judgment from Supreme Judges Based On Legal Value and Sense of Justice Developing In the Public. SAVAP International Research for Peace & Development, 6 (1). pp. 360-367. ISSN 2223-9553

	Text 2015(6.1-38)_Savap_Basic Recontruction.pdf Download (719kB)
	Text Basic_Reconstruction_of_Legal_Judgment_from_Suprem.pdf Download (1MB)

Abstract

Justice is organized by court as a facility or vehicle for reaching justice. Role of the court in upholding justice is inescapable. So the court is forced to realize abstract ideas of justice. An important instrument of the court is the judge. The legal system of civil law prerequisites the judge to realize justice and main motive in the dynamic of legal reconstruction. The ground of legal judgment from the judge in the appeal, specifically criminal case raises controversies in the academic and practical fields. The controversy shows if decision or verdict of supreme judges is not wholly satisfying the public sense of justice. Whereas the reasoning from the supreme judges is still curtailed by normative rule of law and it tends to be pragmatic. The reasoning is patterned into three patterns of thought: the reasoning of partial judge, reasoning from ethical judge and reasoning of pragmatic judge. New construction of judge's legal judgment relates closely with judge's attitude. Moreover, paradigm of thought from the judge becomes second grounds.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Supreme Judges, Legal Value, Sense of Justice
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General) > Administration Law K Law > Administration Law
Divisions:	Faculty of Law > Bachelor of Law > Magister of Law Faculty of Law > Magister of Law
Depositing User:	Perpus Ubhara Surabaya
Date Deposited:	28 Oct 2022 05:20
Last Modified:	09 Nov 2022 06:20
URI:	http://eprints.ubhara.ac.id/id/eprint/1499

Actions (login required)

View Item