Santoso, Bagus Teguh (2022) UPAYA PAKSA (DWANG MIDDELEN) DALAM DUGAAN TERJADINYA TINDAK PIDANA BAGI PENYIDIK. MIMBAR YUSTITIA, Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 6 (1). pp. 75-74. ISSN P-2580-4561, E-ISSN 2580-457X
Text
UPAYA PAKASA (DWANG MIDDELEN DALAM DUGAAN TERJADINYA TINDAK PIDANA BAGI PENYIDIK.pdf Download (496kB) |
|
Text
UPAYA_PAKSA__DWANG_MIDDELEN__DALAM_DUGAAN_TERJADIN.pdf Download (3MB) |
Abstract
The supreme court didn’t make the gradation on the evidence law in the process of the law enforcement on the first stage/pre-trial (investigation and introgation) and the second stage/trial (prosecution and verdict). Meanwhile, the provisions of article 184 KUHAP is related with the provisions of the next article 185, 186, 187, 188, and 189 KUHAP. That proves that the gradation of legal evidence in article 184 is for the second stage/ trial process. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The research approach used is the statutory approach, the conceptual approach and the cases approach to coercive measures (dwang middelen) in the alleged occurrence of criminal acts for investigators based on the Criminal Procedure Code and the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 21/ PUU-XII/2014. This study aims to analyze disharmony as a legal consequence of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014. If the verdict of supreme court aquo has the character final and binding, then after 30 days it was decided and declared in the gazette. As the law effect, all measures from the investigator were guided by KUHAP, in the frame of the force effort (dwang middelen) when the determination of the suspect, the arrest, and the detention is called as the breach of the legality principle and the rechtmatigeheid van bestur principle. That measures is null and void (neitigheid van rechtswege), therefore when tested by the pre-trial process about that measures, then the lawsuit filed by the applicant is very feasible and rasionable based on the law and appropriate to be accepted by the judge of pre-trial examiner.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Force Effort, Pre-Trial, Null and Void |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) > Civil Law K Law > Civil Law |
Divisions: | Faculty of Law > Bachelor of Law > S1 Hukum |
Depositing User: | Perpus Ubhara Surabaya |
Date Deposited: | 29 Nov 2022 02:46 |
Last Modified: | 02 Dec 2022 03:07 |
URI: | http://eprints.ubhara.ac.id/id/eprint/1553 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |