Enlargement of Penis Ala Mak Erot Between Law,Tourism and Health (Are There Negligence and Malpractice Elements?)

DARMOKO M, MURRY (2020) Enlargement of Penis Ala Mak Erot Between Law,Tourism and Health (Are There Negligence and Malpractice Elements?). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 140 . Atlantis Press – now part of Springer Nature, FAKULTAS HUKUM Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, pp. 161-164. ISBN 978-94-6252-969-4

Text Mak Erot_Procedding_ICLEH II 2020 (1).pdf Download (110kB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT--Penis enlargement spreads in millennial times, even the advertisements on Facebook and Instagram are widely spread into daily reading. It has even become controversial with the planning of the Indonesian health minister over the implementation of a traditional Indonesian Health Tourism, one of which is Penis enlargement ala Mak Erot. On the other hand, Tompi, a plastic surgeon stated that the traditional health tourism idea besides Mak Erot such as Purwaceng, Kerokan and Tongkat Ali is good because the impact on the body is also good, but for the Mak Erot case it is still debatable for its efficacy, because it leaves less effect good on most patients penises. This paper uses the IMRaD style (Introduction - Methods - Results and - Discussion, preceded by Abstract and ended by Conclussion). This case in health law can be formulated on three: first, Does Mak Erot-style penis enlargement contain negligence and malpractice? Second, what is the legal solution for patients who are truly victims of negligence and malpractice? Third, If it is true that Mak Erot- style Penis Enlargement is safe from negligence and malpractice, can this traditional health tour guarantee legal justice for both domestic and foreign patients? Legal sociology is used as a method of answering problem formulations so as to provide three research results, first, in the medical record kept by Tompi, Mak Erot-style penis enlargement contains negligence and malpractice, because the patient requests that his penis be repaired, even in the Tukul event, as told by the successor of Mak Erot that the patient was asked to sign Approval of Medical Actions (Pertindik). Second, the legal solution that can be applied in negligence and malpractice cases is to apply alternative sentences from some of the principles of usul fiqh and the application of law of tort as a reinforcer for cases of penis enlargement. Third, legal justice is applied in accordance with the agreements agreed upon by the parties when carrying out penis enlargement. The discussion is divided into three topics. First, the pros and cons of the Mak Erot method in the process of penis enlargement, the pros state that penis enlargement is not done by injection, meaning the penis is safe, different from the cons who believe that the penis enlarges like a body builder in men who are injected with hormones so that it is enlarged. Second, the legal solution to traditional medicine or clinics is a long debate because patients are free to make choices without any element of coercion. Third, Traditional Health Tourism which leads to penis enlargement and the level of endurance does require moral and religious support, so that it becomes an halal attraction for tourists. Conclusions are: first, the need for certification of Mak Erot-style penis enlargement becomes a necessity in realizing traditional health tourism that legally guarantees both patients and alternative medicine practitioners. Second, negligence and malpractice limits must be set by the government in more detail through health and tourism regulations. Third, Traditional Health Tourism should be socialized in all universities so as to bring up alternative medicine study programs that are certified.

Item Type:	Book Section
Additional Information:	Series:Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Penis enlargement, Mak Erot, negligence,malpractice, traditional health tourism
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General) > Civil Law K Law > Civil Law
Divisions:	Faculty of Law > Bachelor of Law
Depositing User:	Perpus Ubhara Surabaya
Date Deposited:	07 Sep 2021 05:06
Last Modified:	09 Sep 2021 06:04
URI:	http://eprints.ubhara.ac.id/id/eprint/827

Actions (login required)

View Item